Strong majority supports eliminating concealed carry permits - 537 participants

Mar 01, 2016

The Senate Judiciary Committee is considering HB 582, a bill to repeal the license requirement for carrying a concealed pistol or revolver. Currently, NH requires that individuals who wish to carry a concealed pistol or revolver apply for an additional permit, which costs $10 and is valid for 4 years. Last year a similar bill, SB 116, passed the full House and Senate but was vetoed by Governor Hassan. On March 1, the LFDA decided to put the issue to its Facebook members, posting the question, “Should NH allow residents to carry concealed firearms without a permit?” The results follow.  

“Should NH allow residents to carry concealed firearms without a permit?”

Results: Yes or No Respondents

Participation:

A total of 91% of those participating gave a 'yes or no' response to the question. The remaining 9% of participants engaged in the discussion but did not give a yes or no response. In total, the LFDA received 1713 responses from 537 individuals. (Click here for details on our methodology.)

What Participants Said:

Yes: A strong majority, at 83% of ‘yes or no’ respondents, were in favor of eliminating the permit requirement for carrying concealed.

  • “If you can lawfully open carry without a license, then you should be able to conceal carry without a license.”
  • “Constitutional carry works perfectly fine in Vermont and other states, and there is no reason it wouldn't work equally well here.”
  • “Someone who wants to carry a concealed firearm for nefarious purposes isn't going to bother with a permit anyway. No law abiding legally permitted citizen should be required to obtain a permit to carry a concealed weapon. I have no issue with offering a permit to allow for reciprocity with other states however.”

No: The minority of ‘yes or no’ respondents, at 17%, opposed eliminating the permit requirement.

  • “We have enough problems. [We] don't need people who shouldn't have guns carrying them without a permit.”
  • “I have no problem paying the fee for my concealed permit. Our system has worked fine and since it’s not broke, there's nothing to fix.”
  • “I am pro constitutional carry. Keep the permit system in place for reciprocity purposes.”

Other: As noted above, 9% of those participating did not give a yes or no response, instead addressing their comments to related questions and issues. These included:

  • Clarifying the applicability of various gun permits: “A pistol and revolver permit has nothing to do with the sale of guns. The permit only allows you to carry concealed and in a vehicle.”
  • Discussing the relevancy of the debate: “Given that the permitting process in NH is a very minor paperwork exercise and a $10 fee, there is very little difference between having a permit and not having one. Add to it the fact that NH is an open carry state permitting anyone to open carry anywhere except in a court building, there is very little difference between having a permit and not having one.”
  • Suggestions for alternative gun control measures: “I believe that a person should have to pass a minimum competency test in order to carry a weapon beyond the confines of their property.”

*Editor selection of actual participant quotes. 

Click here to read the full Facebook discussion of this question. 

Know someone who would be interested in these results? Forward them the summary version of this report. 

Do you think NH should eliminate the permit requirement to carry concealed? Leave a comment below and have your say! 

Site-wide Search

Related Bill

Join CCNH-LFDA

Join our constantly growing community. Membership is free and supports our efforts to help NH citizens become informed and engaged. 

JOIN TODAY ▸

©2017 Live Free or Die Alliance | The Live Free or Die Alliance is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization.